Webflow sync, pageviews & more.
NEW

What are the differentiators of the multi-language solution for Webflow called Linguana in comparison to Weglot?

TL;DR
  • Linguana hosts translations on your Webflow subdirectories for better SEO, full content ownership, and no DNS setup; ideal for static content with manual or AI-assisted translation.
  • Weglot uses a proxy setup requiring DNS configuration, supports deep CMS/Ecommerce integration, dynamic real-time translation, but charges per word/language and stores translations externally.

Linguana and Weglot both enable multi-language support for Webflow projects but differ significantly in terms of hosting, SEO handling, pricing, and data ownership.

1. Hosting Structure

  • Linguana hosts translated versions natively on your own Webflow subdirectories (e.g. yourdomain.com/fr), which is better for SEO and keeps everything inside Webflow.
  • Weglot proxies translations through their own servers (e.g., fr.yourdomain.com or yourdomain.weglot.com/fr), creating an external dependency for site delivery.

2. SEO Benefits

  • Linguana supports SEO-optimized subdirectories, preserving full control of meta tags, URLs, and hreflang configurations inside Webflow.
  • Weglot handles SEO externally, which may dilute your control unless you configure DNS settings carefully. SEO benefits are still strong, but depend on configuration.

3. Translation Management & Ownership

  • Linguana allows you to fully own your translations, which are stored locally and editable inside the Linguana dashboard. You can manually override or auto-translate content.
  • Weglot owns and delivers translations from its proxy, and although you can export translations, it's platform-dependent.

4. CMS & E-commerce Support

  • Linguana works best with static pages and currently offers limited integration with Webflow CMS and Ecommerce items for localized slugs and dynamic content.
  • Weglot integrates deeply with Webflow CMS and Ecommerce, including automatic translation of collection items and product pages.

5. Interface & Ease of Use

  • Linguana is purpose-built for Webflow and integrates tightly into the Webflow publishing model. The UI is streamlined for Webflow users.
  • Weglot is platform-agnostic, so while integration is smooth, it’s not tailored specifically for Webflow.

6. Offline vs. Real-Time Translation

  • Linguana uses manual or AI-assisted translations, and changes are pre-published—ideal for full editorial control.
  • Weglot translates content dynamically on the fly, allowing instant multilingual support without manual translation setup.

7. Pricing Model

  • Linguana charges per project, with free and flat-rate paid tiers depending on language count and features.
  • Weglot charges based on word count + number of translated languages, which can scale up quickly for content-heavy sites.

8. CNAME or DNS Setup

  • Linguana requires no third-party DNS changes, since everything stays on your current Webflow domain structure.
  • Weglot often requires DNS or CNAME configuration, particularly when setting up subdomains for translated versions.

Summary

Linguana is better suited for Webflow users wanting on-site hosting, complete SEO control, and translation ownership. Weglot, while more feature-rich and CMS-integrated, relies on a proxy-based setup and charges based on usage. Choose Linguana for SEO-first, structured bilingual websites, and choose Weglot for fast deployment across dynamic Webflow projects.

Rate this answer

Other Webflow Questions