Linguana and Weglot both enable multi-language support for Webflow projects but differ significantly in terms of hosting, SEO handling, pricing, and data ownership.
1. Hosting Structure
- Linguana hosts translated versions natively on your own Webflow subdirectories (e.g.
yourdomain.com/fr
), which is better for SEO and keeps everything inside Webflow. - Weglot proxies translations through their own servers (e.g.,
fr.yourdomain.com
or yourdomain.weglot.com/fr
), creating an external dependency for site delivery.
2. SEO Benefits
- Linguana supports SEO-optimized subdirectories, preserving full control of meta tags, URLs, and hreflang configurations inside Webflow.
- Weglot handles SEO externally, which may dilute your control unless you configure DNS settings carefully. SEO benefits are still strong, but depend on configuration.
3. Translation Management & Ownership
- Linguana allows you to fully own your translations, which are stored locally and editable inside the Linguana dashboard. You can manually override or auto-translate content.
- Weglot owns and delivers translations from its proxy, and although you can export translations, it's platform-dependent.
4. CMS & E-commerce Support
- Linguana works best with static pages and currently offers limited integration with Webflow CMS and Ecommerce items for localized slugs and dynamic content.
- Weglot integrates deeply with Webflow CMS and Ecommerce, including automatic translation of collection items and product pages.
5. Interface & Ease of Use
- Linguana is purpose-built for Webflow and integrates tightly into the Webflow publishing model. The UI is streamlined for Webflow users.
- Weglot is platform-agnostic, so while integration is smooth, it’s not tailored specifically for Webflow.
6. Offline vs. Real-Time Translation
- Linguana uses manual or AI-assisted translations, and changes are pre-published—ideal for full editorial control.
- Weglot translates content dynamically on the fly, allowing instant multilingual support without manual translation setup.
7. Pricing Model
- Linguana charges per project, with free and flat-rate paid tiers depending on language count and features.
- Weglot charges based on word count + number of translated languages, which can scale up quickly for content-heavy sites.
8. CNAME or DNS Setup
- Linguana requires no third-party DNS changes, since everything stays on your current Webflow domain structure.
- Weglot often requires DNS or CNAME configuration, particularly when setting up subdomains for translated versions.
Summary
Linguana is better suited for Webflow users wanting on-site hosting, complete SEO control, and translation ownership. Weglot, while more feature-rich and CMS-integrated, relies on a proxy-based setup and charges based on usage. Choose Linguana for SEO-first, structured bilingual websites, and choose Weglot for fast deployment across dynamic Webflow projects.