What does it mean that Webflow can sublicense my assets for marketing purposes, and would you do the same with assets from big brands like Coca-Cola?

When you use Webflow, you retain ownership of your assets (such as images, videos, or text) that you upload to the platform. However, by agreeing to Webflow's Terms of Service, you grant Webflow a sublicense to utilize and display those assets for marketing purposes related to promoting and showcasing the Webflow platform.

This clause essentially allows Webflow to showcase your work on their website, in their marketing materials, or in case studies to demonstrate the capabilities of the platform. It does not mean that Webflow owns your assets or can use them outside of the context of promoting Webflow. You still have full control and ownership over your content.

Regarding assets from big brands like Coca-Cola, it's important to note that Webflow's sublicense would only be utilized for marketing purposes related to promoting the platform itself. It is unlikely that Webflow would utilize assets from big brands like Coca-Cola or any other client's assets for marketing purposes without explicit permission from the brand.

Webflow respects intellectual property rights and would adhere to copyright laws and permissions when it comes to utilizing assets of big brands. Webflow's sublicense provision is mainly designed to highlight the work created by Webflow users within the Webflow ecosystem, rather than utilizing existing assets from external entities.

In summary, Webflow's sublicense provision ensures that they can promote the platform using the assets you upload, but it does not grant them permission to use your assets or assets from big brands for purposes other than promoting Webflow itself.